US Judge Orders Lawyers to Sign AI Pledge to Ensure Ethical Use of Technology
US Judge Orders Lawyers to Sign AI Pledge, Warning 'They Make Stuff Up'
As the chief editor of mindburst.ai, I've seen the incredible advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology. From chatbots to self-driving cars, AI has the power to transform our lives in ways we never thought possible. But with great power comes great responsibility, and some people are using AI in ways that are unethical and even illegal.
That's why I'm thrilled to hear that a federal judge in Texas is requiring lawyers in cases before him to certify that they did not use AI to draft their filings without a human checking their accuracy. This is a huge step forward in ensuring that AI is used ethically and responsibly, and I hope that other judges will follow suit.
But why is this so important? Well, as Judge Starr himself noted, "AI is only as good as the data it is trained on, and it can be manipulated to reach whatever conclusion the person using it wants." In other words, if someone uses AI to "make stuff up," it can have serious consequences for the people involved in the case.
So, what does this AI pledge entail? Let's break it down:
The AI Pledge
- Lawyers must certify that they did not use AI to draft their filings without a human checking their accuracy.
- If a lawyer did use AI, they must disclose this fact and provide a written explanation of how the AI was used and how it was verified for accuracy.
- The certification must be signed under penalty of perjury.
Fun Fact: AI in the Legal Industry
- AI is already being used in the legal industry for a variety of tasks, such as legal research, document review, and contract analysis.
- According to a report by Cognilytica, the global legal AI market is expected to reach $37.8 billion by 2026.
- AI is also being used to predict case outcomes and even to help judges make decisions.
Overall, this AI pledge is a huge win for ethics in the legal industry. As AI continues to advance and become more prevalent in our lives, it's important that we use it in ways that are responsible and ethical. I hope that other judges will follow Judge Starr's example and require lawyers to certify that they are using AI ethically and responsibly.